<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What do Sacha Baron Cohen, Michael Jackson, and Paris Hilton all have in common?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.selfportrait.net/2009/07/16/what-do-sacha-baron-cohen-michael-jackson-and-paris-hilton-all-have-in-common/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.selfportrait.net/2009/07/16/what-do-sacha-baron-cohen-michael-jackson-and-paris-hilton-all-have-in-common/</link>
	<description>art contemporain, situationnisme, marxisme, esthetiques relationellese</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 21:04:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob ross</title>
		<link>http://blog.selfportrait.net/2009/07/16/what-do-sacha-baron-cohen-michael-jackson-and-paris-hilton-all-have-in-common/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>rob ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.selfportrait.net/?p=315#comment-47</guid>
		<description> While I agree that Lacayo&#039;s article here is off-base, he&#039;s written some intelligent things in the past.   Here&#039;s an excerpt from his Whitney Biennial 2008 review: 
 
 &quot; Like a lot of people, I also hate what the market has done to the experience of art, substituting the verdict of cash for every other judgment. But when I first heard that this year&#8217;s Biennial would be heavy on humble art, I winced. Small potatoes is a dish that the art world circles back to every decade or so, usually out of revulsion against a gluttonous market. The go-go gallery salesrooms of the 1960s led to the rise of deliberately unsalable performance art and earthworks. And the 1993 Biennial, the first to follow the Reagan-Bush era, featured work that its catalog solemnly promised &#8220;deliberately renounces success and power in favor of the degraded and the dysfunctional. 
 
    And then there is today&#8217;s wave of success-renouncing, degradation-favoring art, much of which takes the form of listless flotsam-assemblage sculpture, things built from chunks of Styrofoam, torn cardboard or bits of twisted wire. It&#8217;s piled together with some measure of deliberation, but who can tell how much? Its heart may be in the right place, but it emits an awfully faint pulse.&#8221; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree that Lacayo&#039;s article here is off-base, he&#039;s written some intelligent things in the past.   Here&#039;s an excerpt from his Whitney Biennial 2008 review: </p>
<p> &quot; Like a lot of people, I also hate what the market has done to the experience of art, substituting the verdict of cash for every other judgment. But when I first heard that this year&rsquo;s Biennial would be heavy on humble art, I winced. Small potatoes is a dish that the art world circles back to every decade or so, usually out of revulsion against a gluttonous market. The go-go gallery salesrooms of the 1960s led to the rise of deliberately unsalable performance art and earthworks. And the 1993 Biennial, the first to follow the Reagan-Bush era, featured work that its catalog solemnly promised &ldquo;deliberately renounces success and power in favor of the degraded and the dysfunctional. </p>
<p>    And then there is today&rsquo;s wave of success-renouncing, degradation-favoring art, much of which takes the form of listless flotsam-assemblage sculpture, things built from chunks of Styrofoam, torn cardboard or bits of twisted wire. It&rsquo;s piled together with some measure of deliberation, but who can tell how much? Its heart may be in the right place, but it emits an awfully faint pulse.&rdquo;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danica salziger</title>
		<link>http://blog.selfportrait.net/2009/07/16/what-do-sacha-baron-cohen-michael-jackson-and-paris-hilton-all-have-in-common/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>danica salziger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 18:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.selfportrait.net/?p=315#comment-46</guid>
		<description>richard lacayo can hardly be called an art critic </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>richard lacayo can hardly be called an art critic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

