<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Parliament of Reality Vandalism &#8211; All Aspects of Reception Must Be Transparent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.selfportrait.net/2009/05/04/parliament-of-reality-vandalism-all-aspects-of-reception-must-be-transparent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.selfportrait.net/2009/05/04/parliament-of-reality-vandalism-all-aspects-of-reception-must-be-transparent/</link>
	<description>art contemporain, situationnisme, marxisme, esthetiques relationellese</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 21:04:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paris</title>
		<link>http://blog.selfportrait.net/2009/05/04/parliament-of-reality-vandalism-all-aspects-of-reception-must-be-transparent/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Paris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 22:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.selfportrait.net/?p=288#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Because this is a high profile and costly art work, which, though paid for by largesse, is considered an controversial addition by many Bard students, and people should know how it&#039;s received on every level.  The life of a public art work doesn&#039;t begin with it&#039;s happy-go-lucky ribbon cutting and day of panel discussions, and its write up in Artforum.  Vandalism, even stupid, apolitical vandalism, is an important aspect of the reception of an artwork.  That said, what&#039;s questionable about publishing this letter, which went out to well over a thousand people?   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because this is a high profile and costly art work, which, though paid for by largesse, is considered an controversial addition by many Bard students, and people should know how it&#039;s received on every level.  The life of a public art work doesn&#039;t begin with it&#039;s happy-go-lucky ribbon cutting and day of panel discussions, and its write up in Artforum.  Vandalism, even stupid, apolitical vandalism, is an important aspect of the reception of an artwork.  That said, what&#039;s questionable about publishing this letter, which went out to well over a thousand people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hk234j</title>
		<link>http://blog.selfportrait.net/2009/05/04/parliament-of-reality-vandalism-all-aspects-of-reception-must-be-transparent/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>hk234j</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 03:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.selfportrait.net/?p=288#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Dude, why would you leak this letter?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, why would you leak this letter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

